Watched the movie, UP, last Friday. Heard from some classmates that it was good, but keeping in mind the quality of certain movies (to be fair, noone said those were good, but my faith in movies was kinda lost after watching them), I didn’t have very high expectations.
Perhaps that helped in my enjoyment of the movie — I was rather pleasantly surprised.
Good movie overall, some scenes were very well done, others were lame, but did not spoil the nice bits too much.
Some thoughts on the movie:
Spoilers follow below.
-
-
SPOILERS FOLLOW BELOW THIS
-
-
OK, I guess there really isn’t anything much to spoil, the plot was simple and predictable enough.
Oh, btw, I don’t really know the names of the characters. Couldn’t read that guy’s name off his mailbox, so I shall refer to the notable characters as: old man, fat kid, older man/explorer, bird, fat dog, alpha dog.
Still, I want to boast about some predictions that came true. I’d expected from the first appearance of that fat little kid that the old man would eventually pin his Grape Soda badge there instead of whatever the child’s supposed to receive. To be fair, I’d expected him to fail to get that badge, by perhaps missing the ceremony, but whatever.
I also had the feeling that the house would somehow beautifully land right beside the waterfall after seeing it drop off the blimp, but hey — I guess everyone else knew that as well.
On to the movie.
I felt it started very very well. The whole sequence, from the old man’s days as a kid, till we see him going about life having trouble walking without a walking stick. They managed to convey his love for adventure, and his respect for that adventurer well through having him watch the movie and prancing about with a balloon, wearing some silly cap and goggles. I particularly enjoyed how they depicted his life with his wife — no words spoken, just actions, seamlessly showing the progress of time, illustrating the random accidents in life that eventually led to them forgetting about their childhood dreams of heading to paradise falls (despite repeatedly trying to save up enough money for a holiday there).
The balloon, a rather symbolic item in this movie, was shown a few times. I also liked how they had the old man send the balloon in with a stick, then follow in holding the adventure book (a throwback to an earlier, similar scene during their childhood, when the old man broke his arm as a child).
I could really feel for the characters — seeing the look of disappointment, shock and regret on the old man’s face when he realised they’d forgotten about their childhood dream until it was too late; seeing him apologetically return the adventure book to his wife as she lay ill in bed, and of course, seeing him stubbornly cling on to the memories of his time with his wife (refusing to move out of the house).
Throughout the movie, you could see his love, and longing for his deceased wife. He was doing it all for her — I doubt he’d even have tried so hard to get to paradise falls if not for his promise. Protecting the valuable sentimental objects during the thunderstorm, seeing him neglect all else to bring the house to the falls, at all costs.
Then, you had the brief moment of grim satisfaction when he’d finally walked the house to paradise falls for the first time. Despite all the other crap that had happened, his job was done. This was followed by another touching but more upbeat moment — finding the message his wife had left for him, telling him to move on, he really did. Kinda extreme to just throw out EVERYTHING, but hey, I felt happy for him that he finally started living his own life. I thought he would at least keep the adventure book, didn’t see him throw it out, but he’d most likely have left it in the house (meaning it was ultimately left behind at the top of the waterfall. Could make for a good story for future adventurers who are like WTF IS THERE A HOUSE HERE?!? I guess).
Another part well done by the director was making the fat kid really annoying. Obviously stupid and naive, boy was the kid annoying. Annoying as hell. From touchdown at paradise falls, he caused all sorts of trouble for the old man. Having to stop for a toilet break moments after saying he didnt have to go, INSISTING that they kept a fricking huge wild bird as a pet, insisting they kept the talking dog, WTF ARE YOU THINKING, KID?!? Get your fat face out of sight! The old guy obviously doesn’t want you there, he just feels responsible for you since he brought you there (although it was the kid who SNUCK into the flying house in the first place). All those moments were bearable, even funny at times. Yes, even when he refused to walk and let himself be dragged along by the old man. But the incredible moment was when the bird finally got captured by the adventurer.
The old man, despite making it clear all along that he didn’t want to have anything to do with the bird, agreed to a detour to bring it back to its home. Heck, he even went against his childhood hero, trying to save the bird. When the bird was captured in the net, what did the kid do? NOTHING. The old man had to shout at him to pass his knife. When the adventurer set fire to the old man’s house, and the old man rushed back to save it, what did the kid do? NOTHING. HE STOOD THERE, watching the old man run away, and the dogs come in to drag the bird back, instead of CONTINUING TO CUT THE NET, AND SAVE THE BIRD HIMSELF. And what does he do after that? HE WHINES. HE BLAMES THE OLD MAN FOR ‘GIVING <THE BIRD> AWAY. WTF SCREW YOU, YOU COULD HAVE CONTINUED CUTTING. AND IT WAS THE OLD MAN’S FRICKING HOUSE. HIS DREAMS! DON’T JUST STAND THERE AND WHINE, AS IF IT WAS HIS FAULT.
Rant over. There were also awesome scenes in the movie — the animation was well done, and scenes like when the house first took flight, ripping itself free of pipes, electricity lines and its foundations, seeing people gape at the house as it flew past, and of course that scene when the fat kid was dragged loudly across the windscreen of the blimp. The adventurer just stared in shock and awe.
That being said, there were some rather poor parts in the movie that could have been done much better IMO.
1) One-dimensional villain.
The antagonist in this movie, the adventurer, could have been so much more, but ended up no more than the typical evil guy in Disney movies. He could have been so much more — he was the childhood hero of the old man, make that count more than just a passing remark (“Now my childhood hero is trying to kill me!”). What they could have done, in my opinion of course, was play on the promise he’d made before setting out to paradise falls a second time — that he’d only return with the beast alive. Now, the old man would then have to choose between helping his childhood hero fulfill his dream, or saving the beast (ultimately choosing the latter, in order to protect wildlife, as well as appease the annoying kid). There could have been another emotional moment as the adventurer either finally gives up on his dream and returns with the two, or goes berserk, forcing the two of them to kill him.
2) Imba willpower
When they first arrived at paradise falls, we saw the kid completely failing to climb the hose. That kinda figures, seeing how fat he is, and how small his arms are compared to his body. Then, somehow, with SHEER WILLPOWER, he flew up the hose like a frickin monkey. Yes, I know what determination can do. But couldn’t they have shown him facing difficulty (while ultimately succeeding), instead of giving us some crappy shonen power-up moment?
3) The badge-awarding ceremony
I THINK that lady shown at the end was the kid’s mother, but where was his father? Didn’t he promise to go for the ceremony? Weren’t his parents worried about the kid for being missing for so long? Oh hey, we see the blimp floating outside the building, indicating they’d just arrived. Why is his mother there, then? She would have had no idea he would return for the ceremony. Of course, I could be wrong, and the lady could be some random mother. In which case, disregard all said above.
4) Too much suspension of belief
Yes, I can accept flying houses and all, and hey, even talking dogs. But at least make it consistent. If the adventurer hadn’t returned to civilisation for so long (at least 40 years, by the looks of it), how did he get his power/food sources? How did he make bread, and sausages? How did he bottle wine (so much wine, that he can afford to spill it all over the ground)?
To these, we may turn to the answer offered by the fat dog — he’s really smart. He should be, I guess, to create collars that allow dogs to talk. Heck, go back home and patent it already! He could become incredibly rich and famous, and THEN he could lead an entire expedition to explore paradise falls. OK. But in that case, why has he failed to catch the bird after all these years? Near the start, we see the bird burning the traps with pure pace. Surely he should have taken its speed into account by the first few months?
How about seeing the old man run around, hauling a fricking house behind him? Near the start, he could barely walk without his walking stick. Then, we see him running and gunning, going from sword-fighting to hauling up the load of a bird and a fat kid ALONE. He also somehow exerts enough force to drag his house around, even stopping it from flying away in the wind. The house has a large surface area, so air resistance would be incredibly strong. Not to mention its inertia. Could the South American air be that good?
Oh, and WHY does the adventurer have a fossil collection on his blimp? As far as I know, these specimens are fragile and extremely valuable. Doesn’t make sense to bring them on board something that could get owned during turbulences.
And I suppose the dogs would have to be inbred. IIRC, the life expectancy of most dogs is below 15 years. That would explain why they are all so damn retarded, I guess. But what about the two anomalies? The rest are all bull dogs, while we have that alpha dog and the fat dog. Where did they come from?
5) A disregard for physics
I can accept the house flying — if you had enough balloons, I guess it MAY just be possible (though not ripping it out of its foundations). But the way it started. We see the old man walking back into his home, splitting some cloth thing to reveal the balloons. Then, we see the house being ripped out of the ground. The only way this can happen is if the cloth was so incredibly strong, it could hold the balloons down. Not likely, looking at how the old man easily split it open.
Another thing that annoyed me was seeing the house float at the same level off the ground. Balloons don’t work that way. If you had a balloon that’s kinda suspended at a certain height, you can’t make it fly higher by placing a table below it. I believe what happens is that when a balloon floats upwards, the air gets thinner and thinner. Finally, it reaches a point where (if it hasn’t burst yet) the upthrust just equals the weight of the balloon. In which case, it should stay at the same level in the air. Thinking further, I realised it could just be that the old man was providing the vertical force through the hose. The house could be nearly weightless (but not quite), so it’s incredibly light, like a balloon filled with air. One could then drag it along behind, and have it float just above the ground. I’d have to take a look at it again to be sure.
6) Flying dogs
The planes were simply not needed. Period.
Plus, the three dogs that parachuted out of the planes no doubt died of hunger some time after that, or got devoured by wild animals in the jungle, seeing as the old man just flew the blimp home.
-
-
-
Spoilers end
Still, a good movie. Personally found it nicer than WallE — it felt deeper than that. Definitely worth the $6 spent, and MUCH MUCH better than the mummy 3 and the golden compass.